ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family planning in women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases is a challenge for healthcare teams, highlighting the need for standardized available evidence to provide patients with objective and agreed information. This study reflects the work performed by a multidisciplinary team in reviewing available scientific evidence, and the strategy agreed for family planning, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, information was structured across the different stages (preconception, pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding), and an on-site meeting was convened, in which patients and healthcare providers participated. RESULTS: Specific materials, which are included in this work, were developed to guide clinical decisions to be agreed upon by patients and healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: These materials meet the need for validated and updated information on the approach and use of indicated drugs for professionals responsible for the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Family Planning Services , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivo: El reto terapéutico que supone para los equipos asistenciales la planificación familiar en mujeres con enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas remarca la necesidad de armonizar la evidencia disponible para proporcionar a las pacientes información objetiva y consensuada. Este artículo refleja el trabajo realizado por un equipo multidisciplinar de revisión de la evidencia científica disponible y la estrategia de actuación consensuada en la planificación familiar, embarazo, posparto y lactancia materna de pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica, se estructuró la información a lo largo de las diferentes etapas (preconcepción, embarazo, posparto y lactancia materna) y se realizó una reunión presencial para consensuar dicha información en la que participaron tanto pacientes como profesionales de la salud. Resultados: Se desarrollaron materiales específicos incluidos en este trabajo y que pueden servir de guía en la toma de decisiones consensuada entre pacientes y profesionales de la salud. Conclusión: Estos materiales responden a la necesidad de que los profesionales responsables del manejo de pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas posean información validada y actualizada sobre las actuaciones y el uso de fármacos indicados para estas enfermedades.(AU)
Background and objectives: Family planning in women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases is a challenge for healthcare teams, highlighting the need for standardized available evidence to provide patients with objective and agreed information. This study reflects the work performed by a multidisciplinary team in reviewing available scientific evidence, and the strategy agreed for family planning, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Methods: A literature search was conducted, information was structured across the different stages (preconception, pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding), and an on-site meeting was convened, in which patients and healthcare providers participated. Results: Specific materials, which are included in this work, were developed to guide clinical decisions to be agreed upon by patients and healthcare providers. Conclusion: These materials meet the need for validated and updated information on the approach and use of indicated drugs for professionals responsible for the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Family Development Planning , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Breast Feeding , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/prevention & control , Arthritis, Psoriatic , Spondylarthritis , RheumatologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family planning in women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases is a challenge for healthcare teams, highlighting the need for standardized available evidence to provide patients with objective and agreed information. This study reflects the work performed by a multidisciplinary team in reviewing available scientific evidence, and the strategy agreed for family planning, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, information was structured across the different stages (preconception, pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding), and an on-site meeting was convened, in which patients and healthcare providers participated. RESULTS: Specific materials, which are included in this work, were developed to guide clinical decisions to be agreed upon by patients and healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: These materials meet the need for validated and updated information on the approach and use of indicated drugs for professionals responsible for the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a chronic rare disease that can lead to serious cardiovascular problems and death. Additional treatments that increase effectiveness, that are safe and with a convenient administration that improve outcomes and quality of life for patients are needed. The aim of this study was to assess the value contribution of the new, oral prostacyclin receptor agonist, selexipag, for PAH treatment in Spain through reflective Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed to develop an evidence matrix, composed of twelve quantitative criteria and four contextual criteria, based on an EVIDEM MCDA framework adapted to orphan drugs evaluation by the Spanish region of Catalonia. Quantitative performance scores, qualitative impact of contextual criteria and individual reflections from stakeholders were collected for each MCDA framework criteria. The value contribution of selexipag to PAH treatment compared to inhaled iloprost was calculated. RESULTS: Oral selexipag for PAH treatment was considered as a treatment which adds value, compared to iloprost, in the following MCDA quantitative criteria: comparative efficacy, patient reported outcomes, preventive benefit, therapeutic benefit, other medical costs and other non-medical costs, without significant differences in safety profile but with a higher acquisition cost than inhaled iloprost. CONCLUSIONS: Selexipag was considered to provide value to PAH treatment. It was perceived as an intervention indicated for a severe rare disease with high unmet needs, supported by high quality clinical evidence. When compared to inhaled iloprost, oral selexipag has demonstrated improvements in efficacy and patient reported outcomes, with a similar safety profile and some additional costs. Reflective MCDA provided a standardised, transparent approach to evaluate multiple criteria relating to the overall value contribution of selexipag to PAH treatment facilitating decision-making.
